Explain the measure
Follow a result back to the recorded production context.
OEE & production losses
Connect performance measures to the equipment events and recorded reasons behind them, so improvement discussions begin with losses your team can inspect.
Follow a result back to the recorded production context.
Make unknown or incorrect reasons a visible data-quality task.
Compare losses that the team can investigate and act on.
A low number does not tell a team whether to investigate downtime, rate loss, rejects or the assumptions behind the calculation. IntelliTrack™ uses recorded equipment and production data to help separate those questions and support a focused improvement review.
How it works in IntelliTrack™
Configure equipment states, production modes, relevant reason codes, counts and the ideal-rate assumptions.
Record the events and production outcomes. Have the appropriate users classify downtime and correct reasons through the supported workflow.
Inspect OEE components and the associated reports for the selected equipment and time window. Reconcile a known shift before comparing periods.
Illustrative manufacturing scenario
The team reviews availability and performance alongside downtime reasons and counts. Rather than treating the headline result as a root cause, they inspect the events that account for the loss.
What you can inspectRecorded equipment time and downtime classification.
Your team's decisionIdentify time losses that need investigation.
What you can inspectProduction counts and the configured rate basis.
Your team's decisionCheck whether the baseline fits the actual product and operating conditions.
What you can inspectThe recorded good and reject production context.
Your team's decisionExamine which quality losses contributed to the result.
Practical questions
No. It provides records and analysis to support improvement work. The outcome depends on data quality, the opportunities identified and the changes your team implements.
The workflow supports operator reason assignment and authorized correction. Configure responsibilities and reason codes so the recorded classification reflects what actually happened.
Check their rate assumptions, product mix, planned time, count definitions and classifications. A comparable percentage requires a comparable measurement basis.
Do not assume it is. Review the underlying report's scope, processing and refresh behavior, including reporting synchronization. A saved report or display is not automatically a real-time equipment monitor.
Choose a shift whose events, counts and losses your team knows. Reconcile those inputs and the resulting OEE components before extending the evaluation to larger populations.
We can work through the equipment states, counts and rate assumptions that explain the result and identify the evidence needed for a useful OEE evaluation.